↓ Skip to main content

Role of TLR1, TLR2 and TLR6 in the modulation of intestinal inflammation and Candida albicans elimination

Overview of attention for article published in Gut Pathogens, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of TLR1, TLR2 and TLR6 in the modulation of intestinal inflammation and Candida albicans elimination
Published in
Gut Pathogens, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13099-017-0158-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Choteau, Hélène Vancraeyneste, Didier Le Roy, Laurent Dubuquoy, Luiginia Romani, Thierry Jouault, Daniel Poulain, Boualem Sendid, Thierry Calandra, Thierry Roger, Samir Jawhara

Abstract

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are the major pattern recognition receptors that mediate sensing of a wide range of microorganisms. TLR2 forms heterodimers with either TLR1 or TLR6, broadening its ligand diversity against pathogens. TLR1, TLR2 and TLR6 have been implicated in the recognition of Candida albicans, an opportunistic fungal pathogen that colonizes the gastrointestinal tract. In this study, we explored whether the deficiency in TLR1, TLR2 or TLR6 impacts C. albicans colonization and inflammation-associated colonic injury in the dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis in mice. DSS treatment and C. albicans challenge induced greater weight loss, worse clinical signs of inflammation, higher histopathologic scores, and increased mortality rates in TLR1(-/-) and TLR2(-/-) mice when compared to TLR6(-/-) and wild-type mice. The number of C. albicans colonies in the stomach, colon and feces was decreased in TLR6(-/-) mice as compared to TLR2(-/-), TLR1(-/-) and wild-type mice. Interestingly, the population of E. coli in colonic luminal contents, intestinal permeability to FITC-dextran and cytokine expression were significantly increased in TLR1(-/-) and TLR2(-/-) mice, while they were decreased in TLR6(-/-) mice. In contrast to TLR6, both TLR1 and TLR2 deficiencies increased intestinal inflammation, and the overgrowth of C. albicans and E. coli populations in the colitis model, suggesting the involvement of TLR1 and TLR2 in epithelial homeostasis, and a role of TLR6 in increasing intestinal inflammation in response to pathogen-sensing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 13 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Chemistry 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 14 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2017.
All research outputs
#18,531,724
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Gut Pathogens
#384
of 524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#335,771
of 454,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut Pathogens
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 524 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.