You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Influence of Off-resonance in myocardial T1-mapping using SSFP based MOLLI method
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-15-63 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Kellman, Daniel A Herzka, Andrew E Arai, Michael Schacht Hansen |
| Abstract |
Myocardial T1-mapping methods such as MOLLI use SSFP readout and are prone to frequency-dependent error in T1-measurement. A significant error in T1 may result at relatively small off-resonance frequencies that are well within the region without banding artifacts. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 26% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 46% |
| Engineering | 13 | 12% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 11 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2023.
All research outputs
#20,233,045
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,165
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,770
of 210,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#9
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.