You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sixty years of genome biology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-113 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
W Ford Doolittle, Peter Fraser, Mark B Gerstein, Brenton R Graveley, Steven Henikoff, Curtis Huttenhower, Alicia Oshlack, Chris P Ponting, John L Rinn, Michael C Schatz, Jernej Ule, Detlef Weigel, George M Weinstock |
| Abstract |
Sixty years after Watson and Crick published the double helix model of DNA's structure, thirteen members of Genome Biology's Editorial Board select key advances in the field of genome biology subsequent to that discovery. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 20% |
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Latvia | 1 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 22 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 46% |
| Scientists | 31 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 107 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 28% |
| Professor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 79 | 62% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Philosophy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 13 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2019.
All research outputs
#599,395
of 25,402,528 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#361
of 4,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,059
of 205,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#8
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,528 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.