The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The association between hordein polypeptide banding and agronomic traits in partitioning genetic diversity in six-rowed Ethiopian barley lines (Hordeum vulgare L.)
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Plant Biology, February 2023
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12870-023-04117-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Basazen Fantahun, Tesfaye Woldesemayate, Eleni Shiferaw |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 43% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 29% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 71% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2024.
All research outputs
#4,556,079
of 26,188,345 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#292
of 3,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,980
of 434,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#5
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,188,345 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,657 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.