↓ Skip to main content

The characteristics of a good clinical teacher as perceived by resident physicians in Japan: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
18 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The characteristics of a good clinical teacher as perceived by resident physicians in Japan: a qualitative study
Published in
BMC Medical Education, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-13-100
Pubmed ID
Authors

Makoto Kikukawa, Hiromi Nabeta, Maiko Ono, Sei Emura, Yasutomo Oda, Shunzo Koizumi, Takanobu Sakemi

Abstract

It is not known whether the characteristics of a good clinical teacher as perceived by resident physicians are the same in Western countries as in non-Western countries including Japan. The objective of this study was to identify the characteristics of a good clinical teacher as perceived by resident physicians in Japan, a non-Western country, and to compare the results with those obtained in Western countries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Thailand 1 1%
Unknown 91 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 14%
Researcher 12 13%
Other 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Other 28 29%
Unknown 16 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 49%
Social Sciences 16 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Linguistics 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 16 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2014.
All research outputs
#1,802,399
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#228
of 3,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,818
of 200,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.