You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The characteristics of a good clinical teacher as perceived by resident physicians in Japan: a qualitative study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Education, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-13-100 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Makoto Kikukawa, Hiromi Nabeta, Maiko Ono, Sei Emura, Yasutomo Oda, Shunzo Koizumi, Takanobu Sakemi |
Abstract |
It is not known whether the characteristics of a good clinical teacher as perceived by resident physicians are the same in Western countries as in non-Western countries including Japan. The objective of this study was to identify the characteristics of a good clinical teacher as perceived by resident physicians in Japan, a non-Western country, and to compare the results with those obtained in Western countries. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 6% |
France | 1 | 6% |
Ireland | 1 | 6% |
Mexico | 1 | 6% |
Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 13 | 72% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 72% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
Scientists | 2 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Thailand | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 91 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
Researcher | 12 | 13% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
Other | 28 | 29% |
Unknown | 16 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 49% |
Social Sciences | 16 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
Linguistics | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 16 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2014.
All research outputs
#1,802,399
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#228
of 3,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,818
of 200,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.