↓ Skip to main content

Subjective reasons why immigrant patients attend the emergency department

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Emergency Medicine, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Subjective reasons why immigrant patients attend the emergency department
Published in
BMC Emergency Medicine, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12873-015-0031-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ibrahim Mahmoud, Rob Eley, Xiang-Yu Hou

Abstract

Some patients visit a hospital's emergency department (ED) for reasons other than an urgent medical condition. There is evidence that this practice may differ among patients from different backgrounds. The objective of this study was to examine the reasons why patients from a non-English speaking background (NESB) and patients with an English speaking background but not born in Australia (ESB-NBA) visit the ED, as compared to patients from English-speaking backgrounds but born in Australia (ESB-BA). A cross-sectional survey was conducted at the ED of a tertiary hospital in metropolitan Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Over a four-month period patients who were assigned an Australasian Triage Scale score of 3, 4 or 5 were surveyed. Pearson chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the differences between the ESB and NESB patients' reported reasons for attending the ED. A total of 828 patients participated in this study. Compared to ESB-BA patients NESB patients were less likely to consider contacting a general practitioner (GP) before attending the ED (Odds Ratios (OR) 0.6 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.4-0.8, p < .05) While ESB-NBA were more likely to consider contacting a GP 1.7 (1.1-2.5, p < .05). Both the NESB patients and the ESB-NBA patients were far more likely than ESB-BA patients to report that they had visited the ED either because they do not have a GP (OR 7.9, 95% CI 4.7-13.4, p < .001) and 2.2 (95% CI 1.1-4.4, p < .05) respectively and less likely to think that the ED could deal with their problem better than a GP (OR 0.5 (95% CI 0.3-0.8, p < .05) and 0.7 (0.3-0.9, p < .05) respectively. The NESB patients also thought it would take too long to make an appointment to consult a GP (OR 6.2, 95% CI 3.7-10.4, p < 0.001). NESB patients were the least likely to consider contacting a GP before attending hospital EDs. Educational interventions may help direct NESB people to the appropriate health services and therefore reduce the burden on tertiary hospitals ED.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 22%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Other 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 19%
Unspecified 3 6%
Psychology 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 15 28%