You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Economic analysis of complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine: considerations raised by an expert panel
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6882-13-191 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ian D Coulter, Patricia M Herman, Shanthi Nataraj |
| Abstract |
An international panel of experts was convened to examine the challenges faced in conducting economic analyses of Complementary, Alternative and Integrative Medicine (CAIM). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 67% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
| Researcher | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 16 | 32% |
| Unknown | 4 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 42% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 18% |
| Unknown | 5 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2013.
All research outputs
#13,892,191
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,609
of 3,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,795
of 198,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#37
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.