The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Diarrhoea in the ICU: respective contribution of feeding and antibiotics
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc12832 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ronan Thibault, Séverine Graf, Aurélie Clerc, Nathalie Delieuvin, Claudia Paula Heidegger, Claude Pichard |
Abstract |
Diarrhoea is frequently reported in the ICU. Little is known about diarrhoea incidence and the role of the different risk factors alone or in combination. This prospective observational study aims at determining diarrhoea incidence and risk factors in the first 2 weeks of ICU stay, focusing on the respective contribution of feeding, antibiotics, and antifungal drugs. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 1% |
Brazil | 2 | 1% |
Unknown | 134 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
Other | 19 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 10% |
Researcher | 13 | 9% |
Other | 35 | 25% |
Unknown | 19 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 50% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 7% |
Unknown | 21 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2013.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,211
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,303
of 209,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#60
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.