Title |
Prevalence and clinical presentation of Rickettsia, Coxiella, Leptospira, Bartonella and chikungunya virus infections among hospital-based febrile patients from December 2008 to November 2009 in Bangladesh
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, February 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12879-017-2239-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Labib Imran Faruque, Rashid Uz Zaman, Emily S. Gurley, Robert F. Massung, A. S. M. Alamgir, Renee L. Galloway, Ann M. Powers, Ying Bai, Michael Kosoy, William L. Nicholson, Mahmudur Rahman, Stephen P. Luby |
Abstract |
We conducted a study to identify Rickettsia, Coxiella, Leptospira, Bartonella, and Chikungunya virus infections among febrile patients presenting at hospitals in Bangladesh. We collected blood samples from patients at six tertiary hospitals from December 2008 to November 2009 and performed laboratory tests at the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Out of 720 enrolled patients, 263 (37%) were infected with Rickettsia; 132 patients had immunofluorescence antibody titer >64 against spotted fever, 63 patients against scrub typhus fever and 10 patients against typhus fever. Ten patients were identified with Coxiella. We isolated Leptospira from two patients and Bartonella from one patient. Ten patients had antibodies against Chikungunya virus. The proportion of patients who died was higher with rickettsial fever (5%) compared to those without a diagnosis of rickettsial infection (2%). None of the patients were initially diagnosed with rickettsial fever. Rickettsial infections are frequent yet under-recognized cause of febrile illness in Bangladesh. Clinical guidelines should be revised so that local clinicians can diagnose rickettsial infections and provide appropriate drug treatment. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 56% |
France | 1 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
Canada | 1 | 11% |
Bangladesh | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 109 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 17 | 15% |
Researcher | 16 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
Other | 16 | 14% |
Unknown | 33 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 19% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 13% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
Other | 16 | 14% |
Unknown | 42 | 38% |