You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cognitive mapping: using local knowledge for planning health research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-13-96 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan Stadler, Charles Dugmore, Emilie Venables, Catherine MacPhail, Sinead Delany-Moretlwe |
| Abstract |
Cognitive mapping is a participatory research methodology that documents, in visual form, a construct of the local environment in which people live and work. We adapted this method to provide detailed data about study locales to inform recruitment and retention strategies for HIV prevention community based clinical trials. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 121 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 17% |
| Researcher | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 19% |
| Unknown | 24 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 23 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 24% |
| Unknown | 29 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2013.
All research outputs
#7,552,943
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,109
of 2,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,230
of 200,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,109 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.