↓ Skip to main content

Confero: an integrated contrast data and gene set platform for computational analysis and biological interpretation of omics data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Confero: an integrated contrast data and gene set platform for computational analysis and biological interpretation of omics data
Published in
BMC Genomics, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-14-514
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leandro Hermida, Carine Poussin, Michael B Stadler, Sylvain Gubian, Alain Sewer, Dimos Gaidatzis, Hans-Rudolf Hotz, Florian Martin, Vincenzo Belcastro, Stéphane Cano, Manuel C Peitsch, Julia Hoeng

Abstract

High-throughput omics technologies such as microarrays and next-generation sequencing (NGS) have become indispensable tools in biological research. Computational analysis and biological interpretation of omics data can pose significant challenges due to a number of factors, in particular the systems integration required to fully exploit and compare data from different studies and/or technology platforms. In transcriptomics, the identification of differentially expressed genes when studying effect(s) or contrast(s) of interest constitutes the starting point for further downstream computational analysis (e.g. gene over-representation/enrichment analysis, reverse engineering) leading to mechanistic insights. Therefore, it is important to systematically store the full list of genes with their associated statistical analysis results (differential expression, t-statistics, p-value) corresponding to one or more effect(s) or contrast(s) of interest (shortly termed as " contrast data") in a comparable manner and extract gene sets in order to efficiently support downstream analyses and further leverage data on a long-term basis. Filling this gap would open new research perspectives for biologists to discover disease-related biomarkers and to support the understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying specific biological perturbation effects (e.g. disease, genetic, environmental, etc.).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Germany 1 1%
Malaysia 1 1%
Uruguay 1 1%
France 1 1%
Estonia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 68 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 25%
Professor 8 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 6 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Computer Science 7 9%
Engineering 4 5%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 13 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2013.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#7,120
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,531
of 209,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#107
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.