↓ Skip to main content

Of gastro and the gold standard: evaluation and policy implications of norovirus test performance for outbreak detection

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Of gastro and the gold standard: evaluation and policy implications of norovirus test performance for outbreak detection
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, March 2009
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-7-23
Pubmed ID
Authors

David N Fisman, Amy L Greer, George Brouhanski, Steven J Drews

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Other 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Master 5 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 16%
Environmental Science 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,299,964
of 25,820,938 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#575
of 4,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,202
of 108,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,820,938 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.