You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Systematic tailoring for the implementation of guideline recommendations for anxiety and depressive disorders in general practice: perceived usefulness of tailored interventions
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Primary Care, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2296-14-94 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Henny Sinnema, Berend Terluin, Michel Wensing, Daniëlle Volker, Gerdien Franx, Anton van Balkom, Jacomine de Lange |
Abstract |
The uptake of guideline recommendations in general practice can potentially be improved by designing implementation interventions that are tailored to prospectively identify barriers. However, there is insufficient evidence regarding the most effective and efficient approaches to tailoring. Our study provides an insight into the usefulness of tailored interventions to prospectively identified barriers affecting the uptake of guideline recommendations for anxiety and depressive disorders experienced by general practitioners (GPs) in their local context. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 6% |
Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
Uganda | 1 | 1% |
Barbados | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 71 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 15 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 18% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 11% |
Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Unknown | 19 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 20 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Unknown | 21 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2013.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#1,714
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,672
of 206,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#32
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.