You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effects and costs of the universal parent group program – all children in focus: a study protocol for a randomized wait-list controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-688 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lene Lindberg, Malin Ulfsdotter, Camilla Jalling, Eva Skärstrand, Maria Lalouni, Kajsa Lönn Rhodin, Anna Månsdotter, Pia Enebrink |
| Abstract |
In recent decades, parents have been involved in programs that aim to improve parenting style and reduce child behavior problems. Research of preventive parenting programs has shown that these interventions generally have a positive influence on both parents and children. However, to our knowledge there is a gap in the scientific literature when it comes to randomized controlled trials of brief, manual-based structured programs which address general parenting among the population, and focus on promoting health. A four-session universal health promotion parent group program named All Children in Focus was developed. It aims at promoting parental competence and children's positive development with the parent-child relationship as the target. There is currently no randomized controlled trial existing of the program. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 16% |
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 25 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 17 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 31 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2013.
All research outputs
#18,342,133
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,792
of 14,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,384
of 198,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#217
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.