You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dovetailing biology and chemistry: integrating the Gene Ontology with the ChEBI chemical ontology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-14-513 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David P Hill, Nico Adams, Mike Bada, Colin Batchelor, Tanya Z Berardini, Heiko Dietze, Harold J Drabkin, Marcus Ennis, Rebecca E Foulger, Midori A Harris, Janna Hastings, Namrata S Kale, Paula de Matos, Christopher J Mungall, Gareth Owen, Paola Roncaglia, Christoph Steinbeck, Steve Turner, Jane Lomax |
| Abstract |
The Gene Ontology (GO) facilitates the description of the action of gene products in a biological context. Many GO terms refer to chemical entities that participate in biological processes. To facilitate accurate and consistent systems-wide biological representation, it is necessary to integrate the chemical view of these entities with the biological view of GO functions and processes. We describe a collaborative effort between the GO and the Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) ontology developers to ensure that the representation of chemicals in the GO is both internally consistent and in alignment with the chemical expertise captured in ChEBI. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
| Scientists | 6 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 12% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 43 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 35% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 25% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 2 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 55% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 3 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,201,900
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#555
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,427
of 209,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#12
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.