↓ Skip to main content

The role of identity in the DSM-5 classification of personality disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of identity in the DSM-5 classification of personality disorders
Published in
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1753-2000-7-27
Pubmed ID
Authors

Klaus Schmeck, Susanne Schlüter-Müller, Pamela A Foelsch, Stephan Doering

Abstract

In the revised Diagnostic and Statistical Manual DSM-5 the definition of personality disorder diagnoses has not been changed from that in the DSM-IV-TR. However, an alternative model for diagnosing personality disorders where the construct "identity" has been integrated as a central diagnostic criterion for personality disorders has been placed in section III of the manual. The alternative model's hybrid nature leads to the simultaneous use of diagnoses and the newly developed "Level of Personality Functioning-Scale" (a dimensional tool to define the severity of the disorder). Pathological personality traits are assessed in five broad domains which are divided into 25 trait facets. With this dimensional approach, the new classification system gives, both clinicians and researchers, the opportunity to describe the patient in much more detail than previously possible. The relevance of identity problems in assessing and understanding personality pathology is illustrated using the new classification system applied in two case examples of adolescents with a severe personality disorder.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 159 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Researcher 12 7%
Other 11 7%
Other 38 23%
Unknown 34 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 83 51%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 10%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 40 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,395,112
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
#105
of 782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,989
of 209,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.