↓ Skip to main content

Addressing the deficiencies in the evidence-base for primary practice in regional Australia - sentinel practices data sourcing (SPDS) project: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Primary Care, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Addressing the deficiencies in the evidence-base for primary practice in regional Australia - sentinel practices data sourcing (SPDS) project: a pilot study
Published in
BMC Primary Care, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-14-109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abhijeet Ghosh, Karen E Charlton, Lisa Girdo, Marijka J Batterham, Keith McDonald

Abstract

Chronic disease risk on a population level can be quantified through health surveys, either continuous or periodic. To date, information gathered from primary care interactions, using sentinel sites, has not been investigated as a potentially valuable surveillance system in Australia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 160 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 12 7%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 41 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Psychology 10 6%
Computer Science 5 3%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 44 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2013.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#1,953
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,776
of 210,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#36
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.