↓ Skip to main content

Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials
Published in
Trials, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-242
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evan Mayo-Wilson, Sean Grant, Sally Hopewell, Geraldine Macdonald, David Moher, Paul Montgomery

Abstract

Social and psychological interventions are often complex. Understanding randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of these complex interventions requires a detailed description of the interventions tested and the methods used to evaluate them; however, RCT reports often omit, or inadequately report, this information. Incomplete and inaccurate reporting hinders the optimal use of research, wastes resources, and fails to meet ethical obligations to research participants and consumers. In this paper, we explain how reporting guidelines have improved the quality of reports in medicine, and describe the ongoing development of a new reporting guideline for RCTs: CONSORT-SPI (an Extension for social and psychological interventions). We invite readers to participate in the project by visiting our website, in order to help us reach the best-informed consensus on these guidelines (http://tinyurl.com/CONSORT-study).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 10%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 44 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Other 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 30%
Psychology 11 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 9 18%