↓ Skip to main content

Microtechnologies to fuel neurobiological research with nanometer precision

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nanobiotechnology, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microtechnologies to fuel neurobiological research with nanometer precision
Published in
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1477-3155-11-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cecilia A Brunello, Ville Jokinen, Prasanna Sakha, Hideyuki Terazono, Fumimasa Nomura, Tomoyuki Kaneko, Sari E Lauri, Sami Franssila, Claudio Rivera, Kenji Yasuda, Henri J Huttunen

Abstract

The interface between engineering and molecular life sciences has been fertile ground for advancing our understanding of complex biological systems. Engineered microstructures offer a diverse toolbox for cellular and molecular biologists to direct the placement of cells and small organisms, and to recreate biological functions in vitro: cells can be positioned and connected in a designed fashion, and connectivity and community effects of cells studied. Because of the highly polar morphology and finely compartmentalized functions of neurons, microfabricated cell culture systems and related on-chip technologies have become an important enabling platform for studying development, function and degeneration of the nervous system at the molecular and cellular level. Here we review some of the compartmentalization techniques developed so far to highlight how high-precision control of neuronal connectivity allows new approaches for studying axonal and synaptic biology.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Finland 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 81 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 26%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 11 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 23%
Engineering 15 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 10%
Physics and Astronomy 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 15 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2023.
All research outputs
#4,804,243
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#163
of 1,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,398
of 201,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,534 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.