↓ Skip to main content

Greenhouse gas emissions from tropical forest degradation: an underestimated source

Overview of attention for article published in Carbon Balance and Management, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 226)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
105 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
262 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
765 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Greenhouse gas emissions from tropical forest degradation: an underestimated source
Published in
Carbon Balance and Management, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13021-017-0072-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy R. H. Pearson, Sandra Brown, Lara Murray, Gabriel Sidman

Abstract

The degradation of forests in developing countries, particularly those within tropical and subtropical latitudes, is perceived to be an important contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions. However, the impacts of forest degradation are understudied and poorly understood, largely because international emission reduction programs have focused on deforestation, which is easier to detect and thus more readily monitored. To better understand and seize opportunities for addressing climate change it will be essential to improve knowledge of greenhouse gas emissions from forest degradation. Here we provide a consistent estimation of forest degradation emissions between 2005 and 2010 across 74 developing countries covering 2.2 billion hectares of forests. We estimated annual emissions of 2.1 billion tons of carbon dioxide, of which 53% were derived from timber harvest, 30% from woodfuel harvest and 17% from forest fire. These percentages differed by region: timber harvest was as high as 69% in South and Central America and just 31% in Africa; woodfuel harvest was 35% in Asia, and just 10% in South and Central America; and fire ranged from 33% in Africa to only 5% in Asia. Of the total emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, forest degradation accounted for 25%. In 28 of the 74 countries, emissions from forest degradation exceeded those from deforestation. The results of this study clearly demonstrate the importance of accounting greenhouse gases from forest degradation by human activities. The scale of emissions presented indicates that the exclusion of forest degradation from national and international GHG accounting is distorting. This work helps identify where emissions are likely significant, but policy developments are needed to guide when and how accounting should be undertaken. Furthermore, ongoing research is needed to create and enhance cost-effective accounting approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 105 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 765 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 761 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 130 17%
Researcher 110 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 98 13%
Student > Bachelor 73 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 5%
Other 130 17%
Unknown 182 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 251 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 119 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 42 5%
Social Sciences 24 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 18 2%
Other 85 11%
Unknown 226 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 198. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2023.
All research outputs
#203,448
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Carbon Balance and Management
#4
of 226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,601
of 436,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carbon Balance and Management
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them