You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hopelessness as a basis for tuberculosis diagnostic delay in the Arkhangelsk region: a grounded theory study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-712 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vladimir N Kuznetsov, Andrej M Grjibovski, Andrej O Mariandyshev, Eva Johansson, Donald A Enarson, Gunnar A Bjune |
| Abstract |
Data about delayed tuberculosis diagnosis in Northern Russia are scarce yet such knowledge could enhance the care of tuberculosis. The Arkhangelsk region is situated in the north of Russia, where the population is more than one million residents.The aim of the study was to understand factors influencing diagnostic delay among patients with tuberculosis in the Arkhangelsk region and to develop a theoretical model in order to explain diagnostic delay from the patients' perspectives. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Australia | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 118 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 24% |
| Researcher | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 19% |
| Unknown | 29 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 34% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
| Psychology | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 38 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2014.
All research outputs
#7,186,266
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,549
of 14,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,210
of 198,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#119
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.