You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cardiac effects of anabolic steroid use amongst recreational body builders - a CMR study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-14-s1-p186 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tevfik F Ismail, Peter J Angell, Andrew Jabbour, Gillian Smith, Rick Wage, Benjamin Hewins, Niraj Mistry, Annette L Dahl, Susan Clark, Bethan Cowley, Keith George, Gregory Whyte, Dudley J Pennell, Sanjay K Prasad |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 33% |
| Sweden | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
| Researcher | 1 | 14% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 43% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2022.
All research outputs
#15,267,106
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#951
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,185
of 254,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#14
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.