↓ Skip to main content

Effects of MTHFRgene polymorphism on the clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of migraine

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of MTHFRgene polymorphism on the clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of migraine
Published in
BMC Neurology, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2377-13-103
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia E Azimova, Alexey V Sergeev, Liubov A Korobeynikova, Natalia S Kondratieva, Zarema G Kokaeva, Gadji O Shaikhaev, Kirill V Skorobogatykh, Natalia M Fokina, Gyusal R Tabeeva, Eugene A Klimov

Abstract

It was previously shown that the MTHFR gene polymorphism correlated with an increased risk of migraine, particularly migraine with aura. The substitution of cytosine for thymine at the position 677 of the MTHFR gene leads to formation of the thermolabile form of the protein and development of hyperhomocysteinemia, which increases the probability of migraine. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the replacement of C677T in the gene MTHFR influenced any particular symptoms of the disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Russia 1 3%
Unknown 35 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 9 24%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 14%
Neuroscience 5 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 6 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2018.
All research outputs
#4,974,217
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#639
of 2,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,832
of 200,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#18
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.