↓ Skip to main content

BaalChIP: Bayesian analysis of allele-specific transcription factor binding in cancer genomes

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
BaalChIP: Bayesian analysis of allele-specific transcription factor binding in cancer genomes
Published in
Genome Biology, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13059-017-1165-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ines de Santiago, Wei Liu, Ke Yuan, Martin O’Reilly, Chandra Sekhar Reddy Chilamakuri, Bruce A. J. Ponder, Kerstin B. Meyer, Florian Markowetz

Abstract

Allele-specific measurements of transcription factor binding from ChIP-seq data are key to dissecting the allelic effects of non-coding variants and their contribution to phenotypic diversity. However, most methods of detecting an allelic imbalance assume diploid genomes. This assumption severely limits their applicability to cancer samples with frequent DNA copy-number changes. Here we present a Bayesian statistical approach called BaalChIP to correct for the effect of background allele frequency on the observed ChIP-seq read counts. BaalChIP allows the joint analysis of multiple ChIP-seq samples across a single variant and outperforms competing approaches in simulations. Using 548 ENCODE ChIP-seq and six targeted FAIRE-seq samples, we show that BaalChIP effectively corrects allele-specific analysis for copy-number variation and increases the power to detect putative cis-acting regulatory variants in cancer genomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 70 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 24%
Researcher 15 20%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 15 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 23%
Computer Science 5 7%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2022.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,489
of 4,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,881
of 324,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#52
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.