↓ Skip to main content

Tailoring a response to youth binge drinking in an Aboriginal Australian community: a grounded theory study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tailoring a response to youth binge drinking in an Aboriginal Australian community: a grounded theory study
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-726
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janya McCalman, Komla Tsey, Roxanne Bainbridge, Anthony Shakeshaft, Michele Singleton, Christopher Doran

Abstract

While Aboriginal Australian health providers prioritise identification of local community health needs and strategies, they do not always have the opportunity to access or interpret evidence-based literature to inform health improvement innovations. Research partnerships are therefore important when designing or modifying Aboriginal Australian health improvement initiatives and their evaluation. However, there are few models that outline the pragmatic steps by which research partners negotiate to develop, implement and evaluate community-based initiatives. The objective of this paper is to provide a theoretical model of the tailoring of health improvement initiatives by Aboriginal community-based service providers and partner university researchers. It draws from the case of the Beat da Binge community-initiated youth binge drinking harm reduction project in Yarrabah.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 3%
United States 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Indonesia 1 1%
Unknown 81 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 24%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Other 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Researcher 8 9%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 21%
Social Sciences 14 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Psychology 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 19 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2013.
All research outputs
#1,861,167
of 14,604,398 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,227
of 10,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,629
of 155,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,604,398 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.