↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Magnolia officinalis and Phellodendron amurense (Relora®) on cortisol and psychological mood state in moderately stressed subjects

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
32 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
15 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
2 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Magnolia officinalis and Phellodendron amurense (Relora®) on cortisol and psychological mood state in moderately stressed subjects
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
DOI 10.1186/1550-2783-10-37
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shawn M Talbott, Julie A Talbott, Mike Pugh

Abstract

Magnolia (Magnolia officinalis) and Phellodendron (Phellodendron amurense) barks are medicinal plants commonly used as traditional remedies for reducing stress and anxiety. Modern dietary supplements are intended to induce relaxation and reduce stress as well as stress-related eating. Previous studies have shown the combination of Magnolia/Phellodendron (MP) to reduce both cortisol exposure and the perception of stress/anxiety, while improving weight loss in subjects with stress-related eating. Competitive athletes are "stressed" by their intense exercise regimens in addition to their normal activities of daily living and thus may benefit from a natural therapy intended to modulate baseline perceptions of stress and stress hormone exposure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 154 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Researcher 14 9%
Other 13 8%
Student > Master 13 8%
Other 31 20%
Unknown 47 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 13%
Sports and Recreations 12 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 54 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2022.
All research outputs
#773,759
of 25,307,332 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#212
of 946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,401
of 437,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#199
of 850 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,307,332 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 850 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.