↓ Skip to main content

Thermus thermophilus as source of thermozymes for biotechnological applications: homologous expression and biochemical characterization of an α-galactosidase

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Cell Factories, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Thermus thermophilus as source of thermozymes for biotechnological applications: homologous expression and biochemical characterization of an α-galactosidase
Published in
Microbial Cell Factories, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12934-017-0638-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martina Aulitto, Salvatore Fusco, Gabriella Fiorentino, Danila Limauro, Emilia Pedone, Simonetta Bartolucci, Patrizia Contursi

Abstract

The genus Thermus, which has been considered for a long time as a fruitful source of biotechnological relevant enzymes, has emerged more recently as suitable host to overproduce thermozymes. Among these, α-galactosidases are widely used in several industrial bioprocesses that require high working temperatures and for which thermostable variants offer considerable advantages over their thermolabile counterparts. Thermus thermophilus HB27 strain was used for the homologous expression of the TTP0072 gene encoding for an α-galactosidase (TtGalA). Interestingly, a soluble and active histidine-tagged enzyme was produced in larger amounts (5 mg/L) in this thermophilic host than in Escherichia coli (0.5 mg/L). The purified recombinant enzyme showed an optimal activity at 90 °C and retained more than 40% of activity over a broad range of pH (from 5 to 8). TtGalA is among the most thermoactive and thermostable α-galactosidases discovered so far, thus pointing to T. thermophilus as cell factory for the recombinant production of biocatalysts active at temperature values over 90 °C.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 1%
Unknown 80 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 14%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 25 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 20%
Chemistry 5 6%
Unspecified 1 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 26 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2017.
All research outputs
#18,535,896
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Cell Factories
#1,212
of 1,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#315,254
of 426,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Cell Factories
#25
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,612 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.