You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of a multidimensional infection control approach on central line-associated bloodstream infections rates in adult intensive care units of 8 cities of Turkey: findings of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1476-0711-12-10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hakan Leblebicioglu, Recep Öztürk, Victor Daniel Rosenthal, Özay Arıkan Akan, Fatma Sirmatel, Davut Ozdemir, Cengiz Uzun, Huseyin Turgut, Gulden Ersoz, Iftíhar Koksal, Asu Özgültekin, Saban Esen, Fatma Ulger, Ahmet Dilek, Hava Yilmaz, Yalim Dikmen, Gökhan Aygún, Melek Tulunay, Mehmet Oral, Necmettin Ünal, Mustafa Cengiz, Leyla Yilmaz, Mehmet Faruk Geyik, Ahmet Şahin, Selvi Erdogan, Suzan Sacar, Hülya Sungurtekin, Doğaç Uğurcan, Ali Kaya, Necdet Kuyucu, Gürdal Yýlmaz, Selçuk Kaya, Hülya Ulusoy, Asuman İnan |
| Abstract |
Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABs) have long been associated with excess lengths of stay, increased hospital costs and mortality attributable to them. Different studies from developed countries have shown that practice bundles reduce the incidence of CLAB in intensive care units. However, the impact of the bundle strategy has not been systematically analyzed in the adult intensive care unit (ICU) setting in developing countries, such as Turkey. The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) multidimensional infection control approach to reduce the rates of CLAB in 13 ICUs of 13 INICC member hospitals from 8 cities of Turkey. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 30% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2017.
All research outputs
#15,276,424
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#345
of 606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,383
of 192,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.