↓ Skip to main content

Bites before and after bedtime can carry a high risk of human malaria infection

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bites before and after bedtime can carry a high risk of human malaria infection
Published in
Malaria Journal, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12936-017-1740-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masabho P. Milali, Maggy T. Sikulu-Lord, Nicodem J. Govella

Abstract

Understanding biting distribution of potentially infectious (parous) mosquitoes at various hours of the night would be useful in establishing the likely impact of bed nets on malaria transmission. Bed nets are highly effective at preventing biting by older malaria vectors, which occurs when most people are in bed. However, this behaviour is likely to vary across ecological settings and among mosquito populations. Field experiments were conducted in Minepa village within Kilombero Valley. Two outdoor catching stations located approximately 50 m from each other were established for mosquito collection. On each experimental night, mosquitoes were collected using human landing catch (HLC) by a single adult male at each station from 18:00 to 07:00 h. To compare the distribution of mosquito biting and the composition of their age structure, mosquitoes were sorted and recorded according to the hour they were collected. A sub-sample of Anopheles arabiensis was dissected to determine their parity status. Insectary-reared An. arabiensis within the semi-field system (SFS) with known age were also released in the SFS (10 m × 20 m) and recaptured hourly using HLC to determine the effect of parity on biting distribution. Overall, there was no statistical association between the parity status and the biting time of An. arabiensis either in the field or in the SFS (P ≥ 0.05). The wild and insectary-reared An. arabiensis were observed to exhibit different hourly biting patterns. The study has shown that mosquito biting time phenotype is not influenced by their parity status. These findings imply that the risk of human exposure to potentially infectious bites is equally distributed throughout the night, thus supplementary measures to protect people against bites in evening and morning are desirable.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 81 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Lecturer 4 5%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 25 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Environmental Science 5 6%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 29 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2017.
All research outputs
#6,790,881
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,970
of 5,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,193
of 310,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#43
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.