↓ Skip to main content

Personalizing health care: feasibility and future implications

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
27 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Personalizing health care: feasibility and future implications
Published in
BMC Medicine, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-11-179
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian Godman, Alexander E Finlayson, Parneet K Cheema, Eva Zebedin-Brandl, Inaki Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea, Jan Jones, Rickard E Malmström, Elina Asola, Christoph Baumgärtel, Marion Bennie, Iain Bishop, Anna Bucsics, Stephen Campbell, Eduardo Diogene, Alessandra Ferrario, Jurij Fürst, Kristina Garuoliene, Miguel Gomes, Katharine Harris, Alan Haycox, Harald Herholz, Krystyna Hviding, Saira Jan, Marija Kalaba, Christina Kvalheim, Ott Laius, Sven-Ake Lööv, Kamila Malinowska, Andrew Martin, Laura McCullagh, Fredrik Nilsson, Ken Paterson, Ulrich Schwabe, Gisbert Selke, Catherine Sermet, Steven Simoens, Dominik Tomek, Vera Vlahovic-Palcevski, Luka Voncina, Magdalena Wladysiuk, Menno van Woerkom, Durhane Wong-Rieger, Corrine Zara, Raghib Ali, Lars L Gustafsson

Abstract

Considerable variety in how patients respond to treatments, driven by differences in their geno- and/ or phenotypes, calls for a more tailored approach. This is already happening, and will accelerate with developments in personalized medicine. However, its promise has not always translated into improvements in patient care due to the complexities involved. There are also concerns that advice for tests has been reversed, current tests can be costly, there is fragmentation of funding of care, and companies may seek high prices for new targeted drugs. There is a need to integrate current knowledge from a payer's perspective to provide future guidance. Multiple findings including general considerations; influence of pharmacogenomics on response and toxicity of drug therapies; value of biomarker tests; limitations and costs of tests; and potentially high acquisition costs of new targeted therapies help to give guidance on potential ways forward for all stakeholder groups. Overall, personalized medicine has the potential to revolutionize care. However, current challenges and concerns need to be addressed to enhance its uptake and funding to benefit patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 194 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 16%
Researcher 30 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Other 52 25%
Unknown 38 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 24 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 7%
Psychology 11 5%
Other 43 21%
Unknown 51 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2014.
All research outputs
#1,186,457
of 23,727,139 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#828
of 3,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,494
of 198,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#19
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,727,139 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,591 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.