↓ Skip to main content

Modelling the landscape of palliative care for people with dementia: a European mixed methods study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Palliative Care, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modelling the landscape of palliative care for people with dementia: a European mixed methods study
Published in
BMC Palliative Care, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-684x-12-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steve Iliffe, Nathan Davies, Myrra Vernooij-Dassen, Jasper van Riet Paap, Ragni Sommerbakk, Elena Mariani, Birgit Jaspers, Lukas Radbruch, Jill Manthorpe, Laura Maio, Dagny Haugen, Yvonne Engels, for the IMPACT research team

Abstract

Palliative care for people with dementia is often sub-optimal. This is partly because of the challenging nature of dementia itself, and partly because of system failings that are particularly salient in primary care and community services. There is a need to systematize palliative care for people with dementia, to clarify where changes in practice could be made.To develop a model of palliative care for people with dementia that captures commonalities and differences across Europe, a technology development approach was adopted, using mixed methods including 1) critical synthesis of the research literature and policy documents, 2) interviews with national experts in policy, service organisation, service delivery, patient and carer interests, and research in palliative care, and 3) nominal groups of researchers tasked with synthesising data and modelling palliative care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 115 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 25 21%
Unknown 15 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 16%
Social Sciences 18 15%
Psychology 12 10%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 24 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2014.
All research outputs
#4,406,957
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Palliative Care
#582
of 1,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,823
of 200,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Palliative Care
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them