You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Effect of aerosol particles generated by ultrasonic humidifiers on the lung in mouse
Particle and Fibre Toxicology, January 2013
Masakazu Umezawa, Keisuke Sekita, Ken-ichiro Suzuki, Miyoko Kubo-Irie, Rikio Niki, Tomomi Ihara, Masao Sugamata, Ken Takeda
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Korea, Democratic People's Republic of||1||6%|
|Members of the public||16||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||9||22%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||6||15%|
|Student > Bachelor||4||10%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||3||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||6||15%|
|Physics and Astronomy||3||7%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,171,511 outputs
Outputs from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
of 595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 288,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,171,511 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.