↓ Skip to main content

Impact of a referral management “gateway” on the quality of referral letters; a retrospective time series cross sectional review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of a referral management “gateway” on the quality of referral letters; a retrospective time series cross sectional review
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-310
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ally Xiang, Helen Smith, Paul Hine, Katy Mason, Stefania Lanza, Anna Cave, Jonathan Sergeant, Zoe Nicholson, Peter Devlin

Abstract

Referral management centres (RMC) for elective referrals are designed to facilitate the primary to secondary care referral path, by improving quality of referrals and easing pressures on finite secondary care services, without inadvertently compromising patient care.This study aimed to evaluate whether the introduction of a RMC which includes triage and feedback improved the quality of elective outpatient referral letters.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 48 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 28%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Professor 2 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 8%
Psychology 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 16 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2013.
All research outputs
#19,334,581
of 23,934,148 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#6,833
of 8,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,469
of 200,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#87
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,934,148 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.