↓ Skip to main content

Triangulating perspectives on functional neuroimaging for disorders of mental health

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Triangulating perspectives on functional neuroimaging for disorders of mental health
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-13-208
Pubmed ID
Authors

James A Anderson, Ania Mizgalewicz, Judy Illes

Abstract

Functional neuroimaging is being used in clinical psychiatry today despite the vigorous objections of many in the research community over issues of readiness. To date, a systematic examination of the perspectives of key stakeholders involved in this debate has not yet been attempted. To this fill this gap, we interviewed investigators who conduct functional neuroimaging studies involving adults with mood disorders, schizophrenia, obsessive compulsive disorder, and/or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, providers who offer clinical neuroimaging services in the open marketplace, and consumers of these services, in order to understand perspectives underlying different views and practices.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Canada 2 3%
Italy 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
France 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 71 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 20%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 19 24%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 24%
Psychology 14 18%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Engineering 5 6%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 16 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2014.
All research outputs
#13,388,742
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,789
of 4,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,824
of 197,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#26
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.