↓ Skip to main content

kClust: fast and sensitive clustering of large protein sequence databases

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents
weibo
1 weibo user

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
kClust: fast and sensitive clustering of large protein sequence databases
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-14-248
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Hauser, Christian E Mayer, Johannes Söding

Abstract

Fueled by rapid progress in high-throughput sequencing, the size of public sequence databases doubles every two years. Searching the ever larger and more redundant databases is getting increasingly inefficient. Clustering can help to organize sequences into homologous and functionally similar groups and can improve the speed, sensitivity, and readability of homology searches. However, because the clustering time is quadratic in the number of sequences, standard sequence search methods are becoming impracticable.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 2%
United Kingdom 4 2%
France 3 2%
Brazil 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Cuba 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 154 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 28%
Researcher 40 22%
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 6%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 13 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 44%
Computer Science 33 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 17%
Chemistry 5 3%
Mathematics 3 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 14 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,928,240
of 24,172,513 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,373
of 7,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,412
of 200,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#20
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,172,513 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.