↓ Skip to main content

Is transnasal TEE imaging a viable alternative to conventional TEE during structural cardiac interventions to avoid general anaesthesia? A pilot comparison study of image quality

Overview of attention for article published in Echo Research & Practice, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is transnasal TEE imaging a viable alternative to conventional TEE during structural cardiac interventions to avoid general anaesthesia? A pilot comparison study of image quality
Published in
Echo Research & Practice, March 2017
DOI 10.1530/erp-16-0029
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dimitris Klettas, Emma Alcock, Rafal Dworakowski, Philip MacCarthy, Mark Monaghan

Abstract

The role of transoesophageal echocardiography in cardiac interventional structural procedures is well established and appreciated. However, the need for general anaesthesia (GA) throughout the procedure remains a controversial issue. The aim of the present study is to assess the feasibility and imaging quality of using a transnasal microrobe that allows the usage of conscious sedation in patients that undergo cardiac structural interventional procedures without missing the benefits, guidance and navigation of conventional trans-procedural TEE. We analysed the trans procedural images of 24 consecutive patients, that underwent TAVI, TMVI or ASD/PFO closure, using a trans nasal 2D microprobe (PHILIPS) and then we compared them with images taken by using a conventional 3D TEE probe (PHILIPS). In particular, we compared the imaging quality of the two probes regarding: 1. The anatomy, visualization of valvular calcification and transvalvular colour Doppler of the aortic and mitral valve 2. The imaging quality of PFO, ASD and interatrial communication colour flow 3. The imaging of left ventricle systolic function and pericardial space 4. Transgastric imaging All images were graded with a scale from 5 to 1: Structure: Mitral valve; Aortic valve; PFO/ASD; LV /Pericardial space; Transgastric imaging Average Grade: a) Anatomy: 4.3/5; 4.3/5; 4.3/5; 4.2/5; 4.1/5 b) Calcification: 3.8/5; 3.7/5 c) Colour Doppler:4.2/5; 4.3/5 Conclusion: These results suggest that trans-nasal TEE can provide good anatomical image quality of relevant cardiac structures during cardiac structural interventions and this may facilitate these procedures being performed during conscious sedation without having to lose TEE guidance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 25%
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 56%
Psychology 2 13%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2017.
All research outputs
#15,742,933
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Echo Research & Practice
#216
of 268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,487
of 324,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Echo Research & Practice
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.