You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Acceptability and impact on anthropometry of a locally developed Ready-to-use therapeutic food in pre-school children in Vietnam
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-12-120 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tran T Nga, Marie Nguyen, Roger Mathisen, Do TB Hoa, Nguyen H Minh, Jacques Berger, Frank T Wieringa |
| Abstract |
In South East Asia, concerns exist about the acceptability of peanut-based Ready-to-Use-Therapeutic-Foods (RUTF) for the treatment of severe acute malnutrition (SAM). Therefore, an alternative, culturally acceptable RUTF made from locally available ingredients and complying with local food traditions and preferences was developed. The current study evaluated its acceptability and impact on anthropometry. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Vietnam | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 211 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 45 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 10% |
| Researcher | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 17% |
| Unknown | 64 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 12% |
| Unknown | 69 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2022.
All research outputs
#18,260,357
of 23,452,723 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#1,258
of 1,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,447
of 197,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#32
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,452,723 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.9. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.