↓ Skip to main content

Early management after self-poisoning with an organophosphorus or carbamate pesticide – a treatment protocol for junior doctors

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
21 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early management after self-poisoning with an organophosphorus or carbamate pesticide – a treatment protocol for junior doctors
Published in
Critical Care, September 2004
DOI 10.1186/cc2953
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Eddleston, Andrew Dawson, Lakshman Karalliedde, Wasantha Dissanayake, Ariyasena Hittarage, Shifa Azher, Nick A Buckley

Abstract

Severe organophosphorus or carbamate pesticide poisoning is an important clinical problem in many countries of the world. Unfortunately, little clinical research has been performed and little evidence exists with which to determine best therapy. A cohort study of acute pesticide poisoned patients was established in Sri Lanka during 2002; so far, more than 2000 pesticide poisoned patients have been treated. A protocol for the early management of severely ill, unconscious organophosphorus/carbamate-poisoned patients was developed for use by newly qualified doctors. It concentrates on the early stabilisation of patients and the individualised administration of atropine. We present it here as a guide for junior doctors in rural parts of the developing world who see the majority of such patients and as a working model around which to base research to improve patient outcome. Improved management of pesticide poisoning will result in a reduced number of suicides globally.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 1%
South Africa 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 165 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 29 16%
Student > Postgraduate 22 13%
Researcher 18 10%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Student > Master 15 9%
Other 45 26%
Unknown 29 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 55%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 31 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,899,633
of 25,839,971 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,686
of 6,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,499
of 74,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,839,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.