↓ Skip to main content

National health insurance, social influence and antenatal care use in Ghana

Overview of attention for article published in Health Economics Review, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
National health insurance, social influence and antenatal care use in Ghana
Published in
Health Economics Review, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/2191-1991-3-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nkechi S Owoo, Monica P Lambon-Quayefio

Abstract

The study explores the importance of social influence and the availability of health insurance on maternal care utilization in Ghana through the use of antenatal care services. A number of studies have found that access to health insurance plays a critical role in women's decision to utilize antenatal care services. However, little is known about the role that social forces play in this decision. This study uses village-level data from the 2008 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey to investigate the effects of health insurance and social influences on the intensity of antenatal care utilization by Ghanaian women. Using GIS information at the village level, we employ a spatial lag regression model in this study. Results indicate that, controlling for a host of socioeconomic and geographical factors, women who have health insurance appear to use more antenatal services than women who do not. In addition, the intensity of antenatal visits appears to be spatially correlated among the survey villages, implying that there may be some social influences that affect a woman's decision to utilize antenatal care. A reason for this may be that women who benefit from antenatal care through positive pregnancy outcomes may pass this information along to their peers who also increase their use of these services in response. Traditional/Cultural leaders as "gate-keepers" may be useful in the dissemination of maternal health care information. Public health officials may also explore the possibility of disseminating information relating to maternal care services via the mass media.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ghana 4 2%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 176 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Student > Postgraduate 14 8%
Other 33 18%
Unknown 30 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 19%
Social Sciences 22 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 4%
Computer Science 5 3%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 35 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2014.
All research outputs
#7,097,805
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from Health Economics Review
#128
of 421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,288
of 197,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Economics Review
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.