↓ Skip to main content

Barriers and enablers to implementing multiple stroke guideline recommendations: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
242 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Barriers and enablers to implementing multiple stroke guideline recommendations: a qualitative study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-323
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annie McCluskey, Angela Vratsistas-Curto, Karl Schurr

Abstract

Translating evidence into practice is an important final step in the process of evidence-based practice. Medical record audits can be used to examine how well practice compares with published evidence, and identify evidence-practice gaps. After providing audit feedback to professionals, local barriers to practice change can be identified and targetted with focussed behaviour change interventions. This study aimed to identify barriers and enablers to implementing multiple stroke guideline recommendations at one Australian stroke unit.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
Canada 4 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 229 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 17%
Researcher 36 15%
Student > Bachelor 29 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Other 54 22%
Unknown 39 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 19%
Psychology 36 15%
Social Sciences 15 6%
Neuroscience 12 5%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 52 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2013.
All research outputs
#11,722,812
of 13,205,002 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,079
of 4,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,518
of 157,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,205,002 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them