You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Barriers and enablers to implementing multiple stroke guideline recommendations: a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-323 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Annie McCluskey, Angela Vratsistas-Curto, Karl Schurr |
| Abstract |
Translating evidence into practice is an important final step in the process of evidence-based practice. Medical record audits can be used to examine how well practice compares with published evidence, and identify evidence-practice gaps. After providing audit feedback to professionals, local barriers to practice change can be identified and targetted with focussed behaviour change interventions. This study aimed to identify barriers and enablers to implementing multiple stroke guideline recommendations at one Australian stroke unit. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 251 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 16% |
| Researcher | 38 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 58 | 22% |
| Unknown | 55 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 17% |
| Psychology | 39 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 11% |
| Unknown | 68 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2013.
All research outputs
#20,198,525
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#7,068
of 7,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,113
of 198,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#93
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.