↓ Skip to main content

Genome-wide comparative analysis of metacaspases in unicellular and filamentous cyanobacteria

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-wide comparative analysis of metacaspases in unicellular and filamentous cyanobacteria
Published in
BMC Genomics, March 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-11-198
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qiao Jiang, Song Qin, Qing-yu Wu

Abstract

Cyanobacteria are an ancient group of photoautotrophic prokaryotes with wide variations in genome size and ecological habitat. Metacaspases (MCAs) are cysteine proteinases that have sequence homology to caspases and play essential roles in programmed cell death (PCD). MCAs have been identified in several prokaryotes, fungi and plants; however, knowledge about cyanobacterial metacaspases still remains obscure. With the availability of sequenced genomes of 33 cyanobacteria, we perform a comparative analysis of metacaspases and explore their distribution, domain structure and evolution.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
India 1 1%
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 78 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 28%
Researcher 19 23%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Master 6 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 11 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2013.
All research outputs
#4,144,042
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,732
of 10,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,722
of 94,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#2
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,626 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.