You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Detection of EGFR mutations in circulating free DNA by PNA-mediated PCR clamping
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1756-9966-32-50 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hye-Ryoun Kim, Sung Yong Lee, Dae-Sung Hyun, Min Ki Lee, Hyun-Kyung Lee, Chang-Min Choi, Sei-Hoon Yang, Young-Chul Kim, Yong Chul Lee, Sun Young Kim, Seung Hun Jang, Jae Cheol Lee, Kye Young Lee |
Abstract |
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-activating mutations are major determinants in predicting the tumor response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Noninvasive test for the detection of EGFR mutations is required, especially in NSCLC patients from whom tissue is not available. In this study, we assessed the feasibility of detection of EGFR mutations in free DNA circulating in plasma. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Italy | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 75% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 52 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 33% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 13% |
Chemistry | 6 | 11% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 11 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2014.
All research outputs
#14,473,828
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#769
of 2,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,500
of 209,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,378 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.