↓ Skip to main content

Mapping behavioral specifications to model parameters in synthetic biology

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mapping behavioral specifications to model parameters in synthetic biology
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-14-s10-s9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heinz Koeppl, Marc Hafner, James Lu

Abstract

With recent improvements of protocols for the assembly of transcriptional parts, synthetic biological devices can now more reliably be assembled according to a given design. The standardization of parts open up the way for in silico design tools that improve the construct and optimize devices with respect to given formal design specifications. The simplest such optimization is the selection of kinetic parameters and protein abundances such that the specified design constraints are robustly satisfied. In this work we address the problem of determining parameter values that fulfill specifications expressed in terms of a functional on the trajectories of a dynamical model. We solve this inverse problem by linearizing the forward operator that maps parameter sets to specifications, and then inverting it locally. This approach has two advantages over brute-force random sampling. First, the linearization approach allows us to map back intervals instead of points and second, every obtained value in the parameter region is satisfying the specifications by construction. The method is general and can hence be incorporated in a pipeline for the rational forward design of arbitrary devices in synthetic biology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 12%
United Kingdom 1 6%
Taiwan 1 6%
Unknown 13 76%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 24%
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Other 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 53%
Social Sciences 3 18%
Engineering 2 12%
Mathematics 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2013.
All research outputs
#18,343,746
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#6,294
of 7,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,665
of 197,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#72
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.