You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Behavioural manipulation of insect hosts by Baculoviridaeas a process of niche construction
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-13-170 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Steven Hamblin, Mark M Tanaka |
Abstract |
Niche construction has received increasing attention in recent years as a vital force in evolution and examples of niche construction have been identified in a wide variety of taxa, but viruses are conspicuously absent. In this study we explore how niche construction can lead to viruses engineering their hosts (including behavioural manipulation) with feedback on selective pressures for viral transmission and virulence. To illustrate this concept we focus on Baculoviridae, a family of invertebrate viruses that have evolved to modify the feeding behaviour of their lepidopteran hosts and liquefy their cadavers as part of the course of infection. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 34 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 17% |
Researcher | 6 | 17% |
Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
Professor | 3 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 47% |
Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
Mathematics | 2 | 6% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 8 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,686,949
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#400
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,469
of 194,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#10
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.