↓ Skip to main content

Extracting samples of high diversity from thematic collections of large gene banks using a genetic-distance based approach

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Plant Biology, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extracting samples of high diversity from thematic collections of large gene banks using a genetic-distance based approach
Published in
BMC Plant Biology, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-10-127
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Pessoa-Filho, Paulo HN Rangel, Marcio E Ferreira

Abstract

Breeding programs are usually reluctant to evaluate and use germplasm accessions other than the elite materials belonging to their advanced populations. The concept of core collections has been proposed to facilitate the access of potential users to samples of small sizes, representative of the genetic variability contained within the gene pool of a specific crop. The eventual large size of a core collection perpetuates the problem it was originally proposed to solve. The present study suggests that, in addition to the classic core collection concept, thematic core collections should be also developed for a specific crop, composed of a limited number of accessions, with a manageable size.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
Netherlands 1 2%
Iceland 1 2%
Peru 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 50 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 21%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 8 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 64%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Engineering 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 12 21%