↓ Skip to main content

Clinical review: Checklists - translating evidence into practice

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
246 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
357 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical review: Checklists - translating evidence into practice
Published in
Critical Care, December 2009
DOI 10.1186/cc7792
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bradford D Winters, Ayse P Gurses, Harold Lehmann, J Bryan Sexton, Carlyle Jai Rampersad, Peter J Pronovost

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 357 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 3%
Canada 4 1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 329 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 59 17%
Researcher 43 12%
Other 41 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 9%
Student > Bachelor 29 8%
Other 103 29%
Unknown 50 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 165 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 11%
Computer Science 18 5%
Social Sciences 16 4%
Engineering 13 4%
Other 43 12%
Unknown 62 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,050,862
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,821
of 6,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,304
of 176,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#5
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.