You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical review: Checklists - translating evidence into practice
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, December 2009
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc7792 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bradford D Winters, Ayse P Gurses, Harold Lehmann, J Bryan Sexton, Carlyle Jai Rampersad, Peter J Pronovost |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 42% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
New Zealand | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 357 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 11 | 3% |
Canada | 4 | 1% |
South Africa | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Denmark | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 329 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 59 | 17% |
Researcher | 43 | 12% |
Other | 41 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 29 | 8% |
Other | 103 | 29% |
Unknown | 50 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 165 | 46% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 11% |
Computer Science | 18 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 16 | 4% |
Engineering | 13 | 4% |
Other | 43 | 12% |
Unknown | 62 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,050,862
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,821
of 6,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,304
of 176,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#5
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.