You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Physiological responses of young thoroughbred horses to intermittent high-intensity treadmill training
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1751-0147-55-59 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hajime Ohmura, Akira Matsui, Tetsuro Hada, James H Jones |
| Abstract |
Training of young Thoroughbred horses must balance development of cardiopulmonary function and aerobic capacity with loading of the musculoskeletal system that can potentially cause structural damage and/or lameness. High-speed equine treadmills are sometimes used to supplement exercise on a track in the training of young Thoroughbreds because the horse can run at high speeds but without the added weight of a rider. We tested the hypothesis that intermittent high-intensity exercise on a treadmill of young Thoroughbred horses entering training can enhance development of aerobic capacity (VO2max) and running performance more than conventional training under saddle, and do so without causing lameness. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 22% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Australia | 2 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 67% |
| Scientists | 7 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 18 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 21% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 13 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2016.
All research outputs
#1,806,065
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
#22
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,335
of 209,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.