You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Perspectives on the role of stakeholders in knowledge translation in health policy development in Uganda
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-324 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Juliet Nabyonga Orem, Bruno Marchal, DavidKaawa Mafigiri, Freddie Ssengooba, Jean Macq, Valeria Campos Da Silveira, Bart Criel |
Abstract |
Stakeholder roles in the application of evidence are influenced by context, the nature of the evidence, the policy development process, and stakeholder interactions. Past research has highlighted the role of stakeholders in knowledge translation (KT) without paying adequate attention to the peculiarities of low-income countries. Here we identify the roles, relations, and interactions among the key stakeholders involved in KT in Uganda and the challenges that they face. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 1 | 14% |
Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
South Africa | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sierra Leone | 1 | <1% |
Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 129 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 27 | 20% |
Student > Master | 21 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
Other | 10 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
Other | 25 | 19% |
Unknown | 23 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 23% |
Social Sciences | 28 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 3% |
Other | 13 | 10% |
Unknown | 32 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2013.
All research outputs
#5,500,541
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,368
of 7,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,544
of 198,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#22
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.