↓ Skip to main content

Locomotory control in amphioxus larvae: new insights from neurotransmitter data

Overview of attention for article published in EvoDevo, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Locomotory control in amphioxus larvae: new insights from neurotransmitter data
Published in
EvoDevo, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13227-017-0067-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thurston Lacalli, Simona Candiani

Abstract

Amphioxus larvae have a midbrain-level locomotory control center whose overall organization is known from serial TEM reconstructions. How it functions has been a puzzle, owing to uncertainty as to the transmitters used by each class of neurons, but this has recently become clearer. We summarize what is now known, and correct past misconceptions: The large paired neurons at the core of the control center are glutamatergic, and hence excitatory, the commissural neurons are GABAergic, hence probably inhibitory, and both motoneurons and ipsilateral projection neurons are cholinergic, suggesting that the latter, a class of interneurons, may be derived evolutionarily from the former. The data clarify some aspects of how fast and slow swimming are controlled and prevented from interfering with one another, but leave open the source of pacemaker activity, which could reside in the large paired neurons or circuits associated with them. A unusual type of non-synaptic junction links the fast and slow systems, but how these junctions function is open to interpretation, depending chiefly on whether they act to couple adjacent cells independent of cell type, or can have differential effects that vary with cell type. Some evolutionary implications are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 28%
Researcher 5 28%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 6 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2017.
All research outputs
#18,536,772
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from EvoDevo
#292
of 319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,469
of 306,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EvoDevo
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.