↓ Skip to main content

A two-way street: bridging implementation science and cultural adaptations of mental health treatments

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
214 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
331 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A two-way street: bridging implementation science and cultural adaptations of mental health treatments
Published in
Implementation Science, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-8-90
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leopoldo J Cabassa, Ana A Baumann

Abstract

Racial and ethnic disparities in the United States exist along the entire continuum of mental health care, from access and use of services to the quality and outcomes of care. Efforts to address these inequities in mental health care have focused on adapting evidence-based treatments to clients' diverse cultural backgrounds. Yet, like many evidence-based treatments, culturally adapted interventions remain largely unused in usual care settings. We propose that a viable avenue to address this critical question is to create a dialogue between the fields of implementation science and cultural adaptation. In this paper, we discuss how integrating these two fields can make significant contributions to reducing racial and ethnic disparities in mental health care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Argentina 2 <1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 320 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 20%
Researcher 61 18%
Student > Master 45 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 11%
Other 15 5%
Other 48 15%
Unknown 59 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 92 28%
Social Sciences 71 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 7%
Computer Science 5 2%
Other 21 6%
Unknown 82 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,548,397
of 25,292,378 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#523
of 1,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,162
of 205,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#5
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,378 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.